The 3bet is a myth here I bring you a clear example of why stats are not ideal for winning below I put a sample of 500,000 hands of "kush789" For me one of the best regs on FullTilt NL200FR since anything beats 8bb/100 alacanze of the very few
if this crack post your stats in any forum without showing their winrate in 500k hands and see their 3bet of "only" 3.1% for NL200 you llamarain NIT, rock or other niceties and tell him to come down level because it certainly is not winning in the current or would be a break-even then I say JAJAJAJAJA (click to enlarge)
it seems it
wins and a lot ... I've seen videos of this player and is a real crack which bases its style in several lines:
- defends the blind person doing 3bet hands as strong as AQ or TT, JJ, AK, KQ, KJ, AJ and other medium-strength hands
- NL200 he explains that henceforth all preflop world has a pretty decent skill and our edge is to come after the flop.
coldcall - doing with these hands hold in the hands of many hands dominated the villains use to steal such as weak aces, K weak, etc ...
3betea - and after a very polarized range based on total waste of q3s type that is easily undone and premiuns with which easily comitee
- practically all of its 3bet BTN is where a range 3betea brodways big with PP or premiums
- 3betea not always even AA or KK against UTG raises and people play with these incredibly stragihtforward 3bets and extract more value
- postflop also takes a lot of pot control lines to avoid us postflop
tough decisions soon NANONOKO study shall be submitted to midstakes another crack at pokerstars
magnum
